Re: Evidence proving Bush should be impeached?

Current Events » in reply to Evidence proving Bush should be impeached?

O'Leary — 6/28/2002 9:26:32 AM (archived)

Not even a liberal would be that stupid!Religion is one thing that knows no political boundaries. If they tried to drum up impeachment fever their own constituents would go ballistic.

The whole thread (15 posts)

Dang! Gone for three days and I'm three pages behind. - Tom Brosz - 6/28/2002 5:02:30 PM
- The First Amendment *always* applies, Tom - Mary Anne - 6/29/2002 6:47:00 PM
  - Disney character - Tom Brosz - 6/29/2002 8:07:51 AM
- We missed you. - Bowser - 6/28/2002 6:26:33 PM
  - Missed you too, but I noticed my ulcer got smaller ;) - Tom Brosz - 6/28/2002 7:23:34 PM
    - Re: W’ll, yeah . . . - D. Spires - 6/28/2002 10:33:28 AM
      - Re: W’ll, yeah . . . - Tom Brosz - 6/28/2002 11:00:21 AM
- Evidence proving Bush should be impeached? - p - 6/28/2002 5:46:28 PM
  - Hysteria - Bowser - 6/28/2002 6:31:03 PM
  - Re: Evidence proving Bush should be impeached? - O'Leary - 6/28/2002 9:26:32 AM
  - Well, saying that and applying a religious test are extremely diferent things. § (n/t) - ebnelson - 6/28/2002 8:01:17 AM
- Oh yeah, then there's this... - Tom Brosz - 6/28/2002 5:30:51 PM
  - Well, this is a worry. - Bowser - 6/29/2002 7:27:00 PM
    - No worries, mate. - Tom Brosz - 6/29/2002 8:06:12 AM
  - They don't want reguation, they want money. - ebnelson - 6/28/2002 8:57:25 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)