Before you go on to your conclusion that "Iraq's days as an independent country are therefore limited." I think we need to see verifiable evidence that Saddam Hussein or verifiable Iraqi agents were involved in 911.
I completely agree with your comment that "Attacking the United States and killing 3,000 innocent people cannot be tolerated."
All we need to do is identify the perpetrators of this horrible deed and bring them to justice. And if that turns out to be someone besides the Iraqi dictator, then what?
After all, it was not employees of an Iraqi communications company which reportedly got the two hour warning of the impending attack on WTC, but an Israeli one.
sp
Current Events » in reply to UI think there is evidence that Sadam was involved in the 9/11 attack
Let's see the evidence
The whole thread (30 posts)
- Carter demonstrates just why he is considered an idiot
- Weakness, Vacillation and Division
- Re: Carter's article
- So was Chamberlain's response to Hitler ;-) (n/t) (n/t)
- Chamberlain's response to Hitler was "thoughtful, sensible and justified"? (n/t)
- Yep. And read "Blair", not "Chamberlain".
- So was Chamberlain's response to Hitler ;-) (n/t) (n/t)
- I don't think I've heard that assertion about Carter before, nor do I see how this article would support such a conclusion n/t (n/t)
