Current Events » in reply to Re: Chamberlain's response to Hitler was

The whole thread (30 posts)

• Carter demonstrates just why he is considered an idiot - ebnelson - 9/5/2002 2:00:06 PM
  • Weakness, Vacillation and Division - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/5/2002 6:03:49 PM
    • Re: Weakness, Vacillation and Division - McFly - 9/5/2002 7:45:50 PM
      • Things change fast... - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/5/2002 8:56:11 AM
  • Re: Carter's article - Raoul - 9/5/2002 5:39:42 PM
    • So was Chamberlain's response to Hitler ;-) (n/t) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/5/2002 5:48:18 PM
      • Chamberlain's response to Hitler was "thoughtful, sensible and justified"? (n/t) - Splinx - 9/5/2002 7:55:58 PM
        • Re: Chamberlain's response to Hitler was - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/5/2002 8:22:02 AM
          • Re: Chamberlain's response to Hitler was - Raoul Lannoy - 9/5/2002 8:46:56 AM
            • Means and will - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2002 10:54:15 AM
            • UI think there is evidence that Sadam was involved in the 9/11 attack - Scott - 9/5/2002 9:05:33 AM
              • Re: Saudis? - Raoul Lannoy - 9/5/2002 10:18:48 AM
                • Re: Al-Quai'da? In Afghanistan?! How did THAT happen?!?! - D. Spires - 9/6/2002 12:03:29 PM
                • If the Saudi Government was involved in the planning of 9/11 - Scott - 9/5/2002 10:41:15 AM
                • Re: Saudis? - Splinx - 9/5/2002 10:37:27 AM
                  • Re: Saudis? - Raoul - 9/6/2002 9:37:09 AM
              • Let's see the evidence - Splinx - 9/5/2002 10:03:45 AM
            • Re: Terror regimes invade other countries daily, and receive funding from Iraq . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 9/5/2002 8:52:12 AM
              • Re: I'd love to know which invading regimes get funding from Iraq...(n/t) (n/t) - Raoul - 9/5/2002 10:07:55 AM
              • Examples, please? (n/t) (n/t) - Splinx - 9/5/2002 10:05:01 AM
                • Re: Iraqi Maetyr Fund . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 9/5/2002 10:07:49 AM
                  • Re: Iraqi Martyr Fund - Raoul - 9/5/2002 10:27:25 AM
                    • Re: Careful, Raoul . . . - D. Spires - 9/6/2002 9:10:23 AM
    • Yep. And read "Blair", not "Chamberlain". - Bowser - 9/5/2002 11:55:31 AM
  • I don't think I've heard that assertion about Carter before, nor do I see how this article would support such a conclusion n/t (n/t) - McFly - 9/5/2002 2:22:57 PM
    • Re: I've heard it quite often . . . - D. Spires - 9/5/2002 3:35:24 PM
      • Don't forget the Moscow olympic boycott - Scott - 9/5/2002 4:37:45 PM
        • Re: ah, nobody remembers those . . . ;^) (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 9/5/2002 5:10:46 PM
      • Good man, lousy president - Larry J - 9/5/2002 4:28:44 PM
        • Re: The reports are true, Larry . . . - D. Spires - 9/5/2002 5:08:01 PM