Don't see why I should bust my hump since it doesn't make a difference anyway, but here's just two from the sites I looked at today:
Red mercury: I know what the isotopes of mercury and antimony are, or at least know where to find them. There is no way you can make a "magic explosive" from these two items, no matter what you do to it. From my research into chemical propulsion, I have documentation showing that researchers have considered pretty much every chemical combination in existence that could yield propulsive energy, including a number of them that would blow your head off if you looked at them crosseyed. "Red mercury" ain't one of them. In any case, there is no way on earth you could generate enough heat from a chemical explosion to fuse tritium. Heck, if red mercury existed and had that property, I would have stuck it up the butt end of a rocket by now.
Vreeland's rant on secret weapons: titanium shielding used to protect from electromagnetic pulse weapons. Although this is not my field of expertise, I see no particular reason why titanium would serve this purpose any more any other conductive material properly applied. In fact, there are probably many better choices.
Ten minutes looking found me a similar site which plays fast and loose, to say the least, with scientific terminology.
Current Events » in reply to Specifics please
Re: Specifics please
The whole thread (48 posts)
- Flight 11 -- An Escort of Lies
- A little research...
- I don't see a problem in this.
- Corrections
- Call Donahue... I hear he needs some interesting material for his new talk show
- "Blindsided" my foot!
- Re: Flight 11 -- probably a moot point.