Perhaps, but as your link on the Lusitania notes, "The lost (sic) of the Lusitania provoked great outrage in the United States and helped create the climate of public opinion that would later allow America to join the war."
Apparently the Lusitania was carrying munitions, in violation of our declared neutrality, and it was this fact which provoked the Germans into attacking. I've seen a report which indicates that the Germans had attempted to place advertisements in 50 American newspapers warning prospective passangers against travelling on her, but the ads were suppressed in all but a Des Moines paper.
I didn't mention Korea in my earlier post, but there is some evidence of hanky panky there, too, in the form of Dean Achison's infamous 1950 speech wherein he neglected to mention S. Korea when describing American defense comittments.
Shades of Kuwait.
sp
Current Events » in reply to The Lusitania was sunk in 1915...
Re: The Lusitania
The whole thread (35 posts)
- 16 NATO allies agree to start urgently needed planning to protect Turkey, but…
- "Athens gives discreet backing to Turkey over NATO row"
- Come on everybody knows NATO's mission is to protect Germany and France
- It looks like France and Germany are on a roll
- Re: It looks like France and Germany are on a roll
- Today's action could be the death of NATO...
- Re: the death of NATO...
- Stabbing a member nation in the back...
- Re: Avoiding inevitable war
- It won't do any such thing
- America doesn't have the attention span to hold a grudge
- Betrayal
- Danger of Attack
- Europe = racists and morons: very nice
- I lived there for 2 years, Mary Anne
- Betrayal
- America doesn't have the attention span to hold a grudge
- It won't do any such thing
- Re: Avoiding inevitable war
- Stabbing a member nation in the back...
- Re: the death of NATO...
- Today's action could be the death of NATO...
- Re: It looks like France and Germany are on a roll
- France and Germany acting stupidly
