""What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002"
This is not exactly a "we know he has WMD and where he has it" sort of statement.
"Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that,"
notice the 'may', the 'think', the 'Today'. Also notice the fact that its about a year old...
Its as hedged as a Normandy Hedgerow....
also, check out the entire interview, conducted
here
plaintext, just in case: http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/2002/1016chirac.htm
Its even less convincing.
I bet you got your quote off of:
here
plaintext:http://www.craigslist.org/sfc/pol/12334978.html
which has some misquotes and other rips from context. Be careful... awhile back I investigated that source.
Current Events » in reply to Okay, now that's just lame.
OOps, and BTW
The whole thread (34 posts)
- Anomalism, Yetis and more impoertant issues.
- The anomalism thing
- Wow! When you dive in, you really dive in!
- re: Frightening . . .
