that [SOME OF] the same prople that opposed the Iraq war are screaming for us to go into Liberia? Bush has shown some [POSSIBLY TRUTHFUL AND POSSIBLY STAGED] reluctance to do the Liberia thing but he is under heavy pressure from [SOME MEMBERS OF] the UN and EU to send peacekeepers. [AND IS CONCIDERING DOING SO POSSIBLY FOR THE PRIMARY REASON OF DIVERTING THE PUBLIC EYE FROM THE FAILURE TO FIND ANY TERRORISTS, WMDS, OFOs ETC ] If you understand that, I give you A+ for consistency."

Then give me an A, If you accept the above[] edits.

So you are saying that if the Bush reluctance is staged and he is considering doing so to divert the public eye from what's going on in Iraq, then you oppose or favor going to Liberia?

Which is it and what has Bush got to do with it? Isn't it just right or wrong or hard to call either way?

If your opinion of Bush is immaterial to your principles, what has the above got to do with your opinion on Liberia.

The only thing I got out of your post is that you didn't like Bush, then after 911 you kind of liked him with a few instances of not liking him in the middle and now you do indeed hate him.

Maybe if he sends troops to Liberia you will like him a little bit for a while but then maybe if he's doing it for the wrong reasons you will hate him even worse.

And BTW, your suggestion that Bush could "DIVERT THE PUBLIC EYE" by sending troops to Liberia is a hoot. It might make a great Broadway musical.