I do not care what you doubt if you cannot produce direct and more compelling evidence to the contrary to properly discredit John Stockwell’s number on that issue. Otherwise cram your now near fascistic rantings.
Regarding Kennan, LOL, not at all different, for some reason you mistake degree of focus for intention. The only difference I can see would be to a bigot that believes they’re entitled to massively disproportionate wealth. Then to suggest this has a qualitative change on the context and direction, well perhaps you need to reread your own post.
I enthusiastically invite you to go forward on your threat to rip up the facts, as you say. Yet if it is only to add detail that alters none of the meaning, then save your energy. Wait, no, please do, I’m still laughing over your suggested “pretty different†comment.
Interesting how you so selectively view your “facts†ignoring that which does not serve you. The question remains, ‘did the CIA foster terrorist activities?’,… the answer is clearly yes, so the place of responsibility is clear.
That you attempt to distort the facts to hide responsibilty is evidence suggesting that you support terrorism if it is commited by your state of choice.
Current Events » in reply to re: Getting Real, period
re: Getting Real Funny
The whole thread (36 posts)
- Tallying the Dead in Iraq
- Wow! Goes to show how masterful the invasion was vis-a-vis the Cassandra critics projections, Thanks! (n/t)
- re: Tallying the Dead in Iraq
- More people have died in Washington DC in the same timeframe...
- re: More people have died in Washington DC in the same timeframe...
- Yeh. And we should have left baby Jessica in the well. All that trouble for one measly life! (n/t)
- Larry wins the Moral Relativism award for this week.
- Imagine...
- re: More people have died in Washington DC
- More people have died in Washington DC in the same timeframe...
- If only the U.N. were running things...
