ED: "Pitiful that you would think repeating what someone says to be censorship."

MY REPLY: Ed, Mr. Skeptical did more than simply repeat what Mr. Sawad said. He used Mr. Sawad's lunatic rage to justify calling anti-war protestors who speak their minds "terrorist enablers." Nowhere did Mr. Sawad use those words. Skeptical made them up all by himself (or herself).

Associating people who exercise their god-given rights to speak freely with terrorism is, in my view "anti-American." Now that's my opinion and while I recognize Mr. Skeptical's god-given rights to make such venomous remarks, I am exercising my own to tell him what I think of them.

I have no problem with you or anyone else disagreeing with those who oppose the war. But I would have as much disappointment in those who would claim you're a "complicit murderer" for the deaths of thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens because you spoke freely your support for the war as I do in those who call those who oppose the war "terrorist enablers."

Now your own approach in debate over public policy is exactly the opposite. Your first reaction when you hear something someone says you don't agree with is to start calling them names. What that suggests is that you haven't the intellectual capacity to make the case for what you believe in.