Current Events » in reply to re: A few short months ago ?

The whole thread (21 posts)

• Republicans in Congress call data backing Iraq war "weak" - Don - 9/28/2003 2:22:02 PM
  • re: Regardless, it wasn't "weak" a few short months ago . . . - D. Spires - 9/28/2003 7:52:28 PM
    • Always weak. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/29/2003 6:06:49 PM
    • The coalition of anti-American, anti-Bush, pro-Saddam and democrats - ebnelson - 9/29/2003 12:19:39 AM
      • re: The coalition of anti-American, anti-Bush, pro-Saddam and democrats - DemocratcuzIcanbe. - 11/20/2003 5:15:39 AM
        • Actually a pretty good post from out there somewhere... (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/21/2003 3:29:05 AM
      • The House Intelligence Committee??? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/29/2003 6:04:55 PM
    • re: A few short months ago ? - Raoul - 9/28/2003 8:19:47 PM
      • re: And you're pretending far harder than Don . . . (n/t) - D. spires - 9/28/2003 9:01:23 PM
        • re: Occupying Iraq - Raoul - 9/29/2003 9:57:28 AM
          • re: That's pretty much what I meant . . . - D. Spires - 9/29/2003 6:21:57 PM
    • That's precisely the problem - Don - 9/28/2003 8:02:18 PM
      • re: You're playing a losing game, Don . . . - D. Spires - 9/28/2003 9:00:04 PM
        • Terrorists were and are more likely to get nukes from Russia or America... - alcaray - 9/29/2003 6:01:17 PM
          • re: Yeah, right . . . - D. Spires - 9/29/2003 6:25:48 PM
        • should we invade. . . - Publius - 9/28/2003 11:21:22 PM
          • re: I am assuming that you say no, with no question about it . . . ? - D. Spires - 9/29/2003 12:36:01 AM
            • re:Really? - Raoul - 9/29/2003 9:20:09 AM
              • re: You'll need to read the entire post, Raoul . . . - D. Spires - 9/29/2003 6:11:13 PM
              • Failure? - Lindy - 9/29/2003 4:20:59 PM
                • re: No idea what you're going on about . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 9/29/2003 6:07:54 PM