. . . when I said you were pretending far harder than Don.
War against Iraq WON'T make it less certain
That was never claimed. What was claimed was that WMD in the hands of a terror sympathizer needs to stop. For some reason, I agree.
Do you?
as your troops have a created an extremely chaotic country (where there is no control, no trials, but free executing, assassinations)
You are becoming a media product, Raoul. 80% of Iraq is completely at peace and enjoying a free, democratic state of existence. There are even U.S.-led Coalition Forces R&R sites (with U.S. troops in attendance, btw) in-country where Iraq supplies 100% of the security.
100%.
You'll probably never hear of it. That was announced a few days ago by NBCs Dr. Bob Arnot.
which is the best place for terrorists to hide but also for frustrated Iraqis to become potential terrorists themselves.
Iraq is currently showing 60+% in favor of the invasion, AND not in favor of U.S. troops leaving any time soon.
Facts,
Dan
Current Events » in reply to re: Occupying Iraq
re: That's pretty much what I meant . . .
The whole thread (21 posts)
- Republicans in Congress call data backing Iraq war "weak"
- re: Regardless, it wasn't "weak" a few short months ago . . .
