Space/Science » in reply to Why impactor detection needs to be done from the Moon

re: Why impactor detection needs to be done from the Moon

Chris Vancil — 10/25/2003 10:05:55 AM (archived)

Now if you image the sun is way off to the left...yeah you have a clear view for almost 345 degrees giving the Sun a wide 10 degrees (give the Earth 5 degrees clearance) and you build the thing with a sun shade...L1 works and that L2 is on the other side of the Earth away form the Sun...

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (39 posts)

• Mars or Moon... - Raoul - 10/23/2003 4:42:38 PM
  • Why impactor detection needs to be done from the Moon - E.P. Grondine - 10/24/2003 4:41:37 PM
    • Report ambiguous... - Ken Murphy - 10/27/2003 2:30:30 PM
      • Picture worth a thousand words - E.P. Grondine - 10/27/2003 9:43:15 PM
        • and a little more... - E.P. Grondine - 10/27/2003 10:06:27 PM
      • We can afford 400 billion dollar deficits but not 2 billion/yr for manned exploration from an existing allocation? - Buster - 10/27/2003 3:14:40 PM
    • re: Why impactor detection needs to be done from the Moon - Chris Vancil - 10/25/2003 10:05:55 AM
    • the extinction of mankind - Nick Hoffman - 10/24/2003 6:02:54 PM
      • Homo Sapien Sapien go back around 120,000 years (n/t) (n/t) - Dave M - 10/27/2003 9:58:16 PM
        • Point Of Origin Implies No Such Thing - Buster - 10/28/2003 3:08:28 PM
      • Always the optimist.. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/25/2003 8:02:14 PM
      • re: the extinction of mankind - Raoul - 10/24/2003 9:19:40 PM
        • Ken & Raoul Pay More Attention - Mark Eby - 10/26/2003 8:00:19 PM
          • re: telescopes - Raoul - 10/26/2003 9:04:04 PM
            • SIRTF - Nick Hoffman - 10/26/2003 10:03:08 PM
              • re: SIRTF - Raoul - 10/26/2003 10:24:03 PM
                • Cryogenic Cooling - Nick Hoffman - 10/27/2003 7:29:42 AM
          • Should Be Reply To Raoul's Telescopes in space (n/t) - Mark Eby - 10/26/2003 8:07:23 PM
        • Nuclear, not impacts... - Nick Hoffman - 10/25/2003 9:53:42 AM
      • re: the extinction of mankind - E.P. Grondine - 10/24/2003 7:04:03 PM
  • re: Mars or Moon... - Ken Murphy - 10/24/2003 1:09:54 PM
    • re: Mars or Moon... - Chris Vancil - 10/25/2003 11:51:22 AM
      • re: re:Telescopes in space - Raoul - 10/25/2003 4:25:44 PM
        • re:Telescopes in space - Chris Vancil - 10/25/2003 9:31:47 PM
          • re: re:Telescopes on the Moon and temperature changes and the poles - Raoul - 10/26/2003 8:54:27 AM
            • Sky Coverage and Shadow - Nick Hoffman - 10/26/2003 10:11:48 PM
              • re: Space telescope self return for repair...possible? - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2003 8:57:36 AM
              • re: Yes, I agree (n/t) - Raoul - 10/27/2003 6:36:53 AM
    • re: Mars or Moon... - E.P. Grondine - 10/24/2003 5:57:11 PM
    • re: Mars or Moon... - Raoul - 10/24/2003 4:05:58 PM
      • Raoul It's Really Long Past Time You Read The Actual Plans - Mark Eby - 10/26/2003 11:53:28 PM
  • re: Mars or Moon... - Nipper Wolf - 10/24/2003 2:50:24 AM
    • re: Mars or Moon... - Raoul - 10/24/2003 5:33:17 AM
  • There's a reason Mars hab drawings are far bigger than the lunar lander - Buster - 10/23/2003 8:28:54 PM
    • NASA is not serious about sending men to Mars - E.P. Grondine - 10/24/2003 4:26:10 PM
      • NASA Has Far More Serious Proposal's Than Yours - Mark Eby - 10/27/2003 12:01:20 AM
    • re: ISRU - Raoul - 10/23/2003 9:30:47 PM
  • re: Mars or Moon... - Delbert - 10/23/2003 5:08:15 PM
    • re: Mars or Moon... - Raoul - 10/23/2003 6:28:26 PM