Point Of Origin Implies No Such Thing

Space/Science » in reply to Homo Sapien Sapien go back around 120,000 years (n/t)

Point Of Origin Implies No Such Thing

Buster — 10/28/2003 3:08:28 PM (archived)

More primitive Homo Erectus survived long after that and another Homo sapiens subspecies was just hitting its stride. These do not support a global catastrophe scenario. The evolution driver must have been a more local threat to survival.

see ya

The whole thread (39 posts)

Mars or Moon... - Raoul - 10/23/2003 4:42:38 PM
- Why impactor detection needs to be done from the Moon - E.P. Grondine - 10/24/2003 4:41:37 PM
  - Report ambiguous... - Ken Murphy - 10/27/2003 2:30:30 PM
    - Picture worth a thousand words - E.P. Grondine - 10/27/2003 9:43:15 PM
      - and a little more... - E.P. Grondine - 10/27/2003 10:06:27 PM
    - We can afford 400 billion dollar deficits but not 2 billion/yr for manned exploration from an existing allocation? - Buster - 10/27/2003 3:14:40 PM
  - re: Why impactor detection needs to be done from the Moon - Chris Vancil - 10/25/2003 10:05:55 AM
  - the extinction of mankind - Nick Hoffman - 10/24/2003 6:02:54 PM
    - Homo Sapien Sapien go back around 120,000 years (n/t) (n/t) - Dave M - 10/27/2003 9:58:16 PM
      - Point Of Origin Implies No Such Thing - Buster - 10/28/2003 3:08:28 PM
    - Always the optimist.. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/25/2003 8:02:14 PM
    - re: the extinction of mankind - Raoul - 10/24/2003 9:19:40 PM
      - Ken & Raoul Pay More Attention - Mark Eby - 10/26/2003 8:00:19 PM
        
        re: telescopes - Raoul - 10/26/2003 9:04:04 PM
        
        SIRTF - Nick Hoffman - 10/26/2003 10:03:08 PM
        
        re: SIRTF - Raoul - 10/26/2003 10:24:03 PM
        
        Cryogenic Cooling - Nick Hoffman - 10/27/2003 7:29:42 AM
        
        Should Be Reply To Raoul's Telescopes in space (n/t) - Mark Eby - 10/26/2003 8:07:23 PM
      - Nuclear, not impacts... - Nick Hoffman - 10/25/2003 9:53:42 AM
    - re: the extinction of mankind - E.P. Grondine - 10/24/2003 7:04:03 PM
- re: Mars or Moon... - Ken Murphy - 10/24/2003 1:09:54 PM
  - re: Mars or Moon... - Chris Vancil - 10/25/2003 11:51:22 AM
    - re: re:Telescopes in space - Raoul - 10/25/2003 4:25:44 PM
      - re:Telescopes in space - Chris Vancil - 10/25/2003 9:31:47 PM
        
        re: re:Telescopes on the Moon and temperature changes and the poles - Raoul - 10/26/2003 8:54:27 AM
        
        Sky Coverage and Shadow - Nick Hoffman - 10/26/2003 10:11:48 PM
        
        re: Space telescope self return for repair...possible? - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2003 8:57:36 AM
        
        re: Yes, I agree (n/t) - Raoul - 10/27/2003 6:36:53 AM
  - re: Mars or Moon... - E.P. Grondine - 10/24/2003 5:57:11 PM
  - re: Mars or Moon... - Raoul - 10/24/2003 4:05:58 PM
    - Raoul It's Really Long Past Time You Read The Actual Plans - Mark Eby - 10/26/2003 11:53:28 PM
- re: Mars or Moon... - Nipper Wolf - 10/24/2003 2:50:24 AM
  - re: Mars or Moon... - Raoul - 10/24/2003 5:33:17 AM
- There's a reason Mars hab drawings are far bigger than the lunar lander - Buster - 10/23/2003 8:28:54 PM
  - NASA is not serious about sending men to Mars - E.P. Grondine - 10/24/2003 4:26:10 PM
    - NASA Has Far More Serious Proposal's Than Yours - Mark Eby - 10/27/2003 12:01:20 AM
  - re: ISRU - Raoul - 10/23/2003 9:30:47 PM
- re: Mars or Moon... - Delbert - 10/23/2003 5:08:15 PM
  - re: Mars or Moon... - Raoul - 10/23/2003 6:28:26 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (39 posts)