That civilians joining in the fight should not be aimed at?
If so, how about if you go to Iraq and just shoot at the uniforms that shoot at you. Ignore the "civilians" who open fire, because they don't count.
Or is it just the way I'm reading it?
Dead civilians: "...many civilians got their guns and joined the fight."
Okay. Could be that you're using your (n/t) post as a stage to simply point out the media hype that the U.S. is killing civilians, regardless of whether or not they should be considered as dangerous, armed felons in a war zone. In that case, I agree, and your post becomes somewhat funny.
But if that's not what you meant either, then -- what?
Dan
Current Events » in reply to Dead civilians: "...many civilians got their guns and joined the fight."
re: Your point being -- what . . . ?
The whole thread (21 posts)
- Ambushing the ambushers: 46 pro-Saddam terrorists wiped out by coalition forces
- The truth trickles in
- Stunning
- Maybe it was an intelegence ambush
- This has little to do with intelligence
- re: Stunning
- Don't forget that these Baathists have been terrorizing ordinary Iraqis
