So now you believe Qaddafi because he says what you want to hear? If he had said the Iraq invasion had nothing to do with the decision you would have said he was lying.
Your whole analysis of things like this is:
1. If it makes Bush look good it must be true.
2. If it makes Bush look bad it must be false.
Then all the rest of the information is cherry picked to fit those options.
Bush supporters live in this make believe world, free of logic, facts, where every good thing that happens is because of Dear Leader. They are the only ones claiming Bush rehabilitated Qaddafi.
Bush deserves some credit. After all he is the president and is not supposed to stuff up everything he touches. He just came in at the end of the process in which Qaddafi had already long ago announced his intentions to behave to get the sanctions lifted . Since Qaddafo had already promised cooperation all Bush did (though Blair probably did it all) was make a few extra demands which Qaddafi accepted as consistent with his earlier statements.
Qaddafi wasn't in the axis of evil remember?
Current Events » in reply to Wow...that rebuttal was just plain pathetic.
had a bit too much Christmas cheer?
The whole thread (27 posts)
- "In Denial"
- re: Nelson Mandela
- Charles Krauthammer on this
- Libya: Victory for Bush doctrine, or diplomacy?
- More denial: Wesley Clark weighs in
- Hee hee hee (n/t)
- Thee go the Drits acting uniillaterally again...
- Qaddafi rolled over because we made it abundantly clear we would blow him away if he did not change
- it must be the silly season
- Then, there's the "soccer theory."