Hey Tom, I saw that and and couldn't figure out if you were being smart or just taunting me. Because I don't consider myself a "psycho hose beast" and although I think sometimes you're funny, the way you throw adjectives and outrages about the LEFT here, just sometimes gets really annoying. (Just like all those posts picking apart the war in Iraq).
>"Those who think Iraqis would have been better off under another forty years of rule by Saddam and his sons might qualify. "
So now....you agree with George Dubya Bush that the only good dictator is a captured "dictator" with bombed out villages, destroyed infrastructures, dead civilians all coutesy of the US government and to hell with international law? Well then, why aren't you signing up to take out the North Korean leader, Gaddafi, Castro, or any of the South American or South African dictators?
You're missing the point. SOMEHOW in your mind,you see Bush's flaunting of international law somehow justified. Sadam was a tyrant, but he was NO THREAT to the US or the Middle East.
And THAT was the reason he used to start this "war". YOU, on the other hand were sold a faulty bill of goods, you ate it up and now are brainwashed to believe he did the right thing.