Yeah, I understand how this would be unsatisfying emotionally, but practically, it is a good idea, especially for the near-term. I would want to learn one HELL of a lot more about Mars before I dropped stinky, bacteria-covered humans there. I see a serious danger of contaminating the planet, radiation or no radiation, before we can find out what might already be there.
If I had my way, the process would involve nuclear propulsion for quicker trips to Mars, and a large, orbiting station from which massive numbers of real-time remote-controlled probes, rovers and aircraft scrambled across the surface and hauled small samples up to the orbiting labs and then back to Earth.
If sufficient precautions are taken, manned landings could one day occur, but frankly, once the signal delay problem is out of the way, I can see a lot one could do with telepresence before you needed to plop people down on the surface.
Space/Science » in reply to re: Bush and the Moon
Orbit-only mission
The whole thread (50 posts)
- Bush and the Moon
- btw - isn't it cool, having to decide whether the post belongs in Space or CE? (n/t)
- Show stopper
- re: Bush and the Moon
- Be careful....
- re: Bush and the Moon
- The fine print
- Fantastic!!
- Bigger news than Mars
- Some heavy stuff here...
