If it was a premeditated lie, then what was the plan for no WMD?
I put it in the subject line agian because I really did want to hear what you thought the answer was.
It just bugs me that I don't here anyone on the opposition saying:
"well theres the slightest chance that he's not a total wormy slug and that he may have had what he though were valid reasons, but I think they were wrong"
Instead all I ever hear is :
"HE LIED!!! #$@ LIAR!!! #%@%$^ G)DD@$M M@^H#^F%$&NG LIAR!!! MURDERER!!!"
this is not a reasoned argument that I see, only the debate equivalent of torrets syndrome.