re:He gambled

Current Events » in reply to If it was a premeditated lie, then what was the plan for no WMD?

re:He gambled

Raoul — 1/17/2004 7:54:45 PM (archived)

WMDs were the justification for invading Iraq as it would have meant to the international community that Saddam posed an immediate threat to other countries.
He gambled it could easily be presented to the world.
As well as his supposed connections with Al Qaeda.
Both failed and there is no need to call Bush whatever he nor to become personal about it is as facts amply suffice.

Raoul

The whole thread (31 posts)

http://www.praesentia.us/archives/remindus.swf - Why we went to war - 1/16/2004 8:36:14 PM
- So by modern lefty math, we have lost 150,000 Americans in Iraq today - ebnelson - 1/17/2004 2:33:04 AM
  - Your reading comprehension leaves much to be desired - Donald - 1/17/2004 1:49:35 PM
    - The sentence speaks its lie plainly, and needs no spin from you - ebnelson - 1/17/2004 9:23:23 PM
    - If it was a premeditated lie, then what was the plan for no WMD? - Justin Kelly - 1/17/2004 4:57:19 PM
      - A reply - S - 1/18/2004 6:06:09 PM
      - This whole line of argument falls into the leftist rewrite of the rationale for the war - ebnelson - 1/18/2004 1:05:01 AM
      - OK, the President launched a pre-emptive war against another country on shaky grounds. - Mary Anne - 1/17/2004 9:39:55 PM
        
        Or perhaps you would rather just respond to this. The other post was a bit long and dragged out. - Justin Kelly - 1/18/2004 2:20:09 PM
        
        The ends justifying the means. - Mary Anne - 1/18/2004 4:25:57 PM
        
        re: OK, the President launched a pre-emptive war against another country on shaky grounds. - Justin Kelly - 1/18/2004 9:14:45 AM
        
        These people tend to think tactically not strategery - Greg - 1/18/2004 10:37:17 AM
        
        Who are "these people"? - Justin Kelly - 1/18/2004 1:53:26 PM
        
        re: Who are "these people"? - Greg - 1/18/2004 4:07:36 PM
      - re:He gambled - Raoul - 1/17/2004 7:54:45 PM
      - Ah, you noticed that too? - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2004 7:20:52 PM
    - his reading comprehension is fine - Justin Kelly - 1/17/2004 4:48:32 PM
      - re: your problem - S - 1/18/2004 5:21:33 PM
      - re: his reading comprehension is fine - Donald - 1/17/2004 4:56:40 PM
        
        The only fact doncumented in this thread - ebnelson - 1/17/2004 9:25:28 PM
        
        "this fact is now documented." - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2004 7:23:20 PM
        
        What?! Thats great!! - Justin Kelly - 1/17/2004 5:06:38 PM
        
        This is a strange kind of argument, that you are happy to vote for an idiot but not a liar (n/t) - Greg - 1/18/2004 10:53:52 AM
        
        Excellent, Justin. You got Don to admit he is a liar. (n/t) - ebnelson - 1/17/2004 9:27:30 PM
        
        Excuse me but... - Donald - 1/17/2004 11:46:31 PM
        
        The issue is not if the intel was correct. The issue is now you lying. - ebnelson - 1/18/2004 1:06:59 AM
        
        I have just read this thread four times and I can't make any sense of your statement. - Mary Anne - 1/18/2004 3:02:52 AM
        
        Sense - ebnelson - 1/18/2004 4:22:25 PM
        
        re: I have just read this thread four times - Tom Brosz - 1/18/2004 5:43:17 AM
- Drives the point home - Donald - 1/17/2004 1:41:24 AM
- What a very sad but true documentary of the history of the US. One of our darkest periods. (n/t) - TiM - 1/16/2004 8:58:23 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (31 posts)