This excerpt from an internet defintion of "troll"describes your response:

"Frequently this is used to discredit one position in an argument. By asserting that
one's opponents are trolls, one is asserting that they are only maintaining their position in
order to feed the flames, and that their position is actually indefensible. This use of "troll" is
however then an ad hominem argument, and is itself thus usually indefensible - most
correct views have historically met with opposition, so the label "troll" used this way is
actually more likely to indicate a correct but controversial position that is stirring up flames
precisely because it has challenged a doctrine others actually realize is wrong."

http://www.wordiq.com/cgi-bin/knowledge/lookup.cgi?title=Internet_troll

Look at the photo, troll.

If you're referring to the photo of headstones with crosses etched in them, I've looked and
was unimpressed.

The demohack obsession with turning Republicans into either stupid people or liars or
the new hitler is one of the great resources of the Republican party:

"Turning?" To paraphrase Popeye, you is what you is.

-

it whos just how silly and pointless your claims really are.

I don't believe it whos that at all.

Please keep it up.

Ok, but educating you won't come cheap. I'll need cookies.

-

BTW, Abe Lincoln is going to come kick your ass for even putting his name in the same
sentance as clintoon.

Annie Sullivan had it easy compared to this. Where to begin? Spelling?