Oh, Shut Up! It has been explained to you several times!

Space/Science » in reply to Colors still not correct.

Oh, Shut Up! It has been explained to you several times!

R.L. — 1/25/2004 5:20:55 PM (archived)

Note to NASA: Next time use only 'Bob approved' filters, not the filters your experts choose for best science return....

It is telling that when you saw green on Mars you thought the color was perfectly realistic....

One last time- the point of these missions is NOT 'lets spend 800 million dollars so that we can give Bob cool pictures'....

The point is to get as much useful data as we can

The whole thread (28 posts)

Color shot on the NASA channel... - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 10:19:40 AM
- re: Voila! - Raoul - 1/25/2004 11:04:50 AM
  - Did It Land In A Crater? - Mark Eby - 1/25/2004 3:55:41 PM
    - Duh Again, Need To Start On Older Posts (n/t) - Mark Eby - 1/25/2004 3:58:58 PM
  - Colors still not correct. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 3:15:40 PM
    - Oh, Shut Up! It has been explained to you several times! - R.L. - 1/25/2004 5:20:55 PM
      - It is easy to get an image with the right colors. Why not do it? - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 5:50:15 PM
        
        re: It is easy to get an image with the right colors. Why not do it? - Johannes - 1/25/2004 7:32:09 PM
        
        It isnt easy, or even possible, Bob - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:21:35 PM
        
        Oh, and here is an unrelated fact about the eye that I bet no one here will believe: - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:27:46 PM
        
        Does that mean you would be happy with a digital camera that changed a blue NASA logo into red? (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:26:25 PM
        
        No, Bob- But the camera on the rover is not for holiday snapshots - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:48:28 PM
        
        PART of the reason for putting filters on the rover in the visible spectrum is the public giving the colors of Mars. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 7:03:55 PM
        
        Chlorophyll is far more unmistakeable in the 'invisible' part of the spectrum - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:19:08 PM
        
        There are some type of lichen for which chlorophyll is not visible. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 7:49:32 PM
        
        Bob, you need more patience. - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 8:33:49 PM
        
        So you think white is a spectral color? (n/t) - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:11:43 PM
        
        An example for Bob - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:57:35 PM
        
        re: An example for Bob - Johannes - 1/25/2004 7:59:12 PM
        
        and another - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:09:52 PM
        
        I agree that a camera can pick more detail than the human eye. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 8:00:07 PM
        
        Again, you moron.... - R.L. - 1/25/2004 8:40:26 PM
        
        Gee, Bob- maybe they are busy doing real science? - R.L. - 1/25/2004 5:58:59 PM
        
        It's JUST as easy to release the correct color image as the wrong one. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:15:21 PM
        
        No it isnt- see above (n/t) - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:51:05 PM
        
        Polly want a cracker! Polly want a cracker! (n/t) - Polly - 1/25/2004 5:58:09 PM
        
        Right back at ya, bud. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:18:45 PM
  - re: Voila! - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 11:27:15 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (28 posts)