Again, you moron....

Space/Science » in reply to I agree that a camera can pick more detail than the human eye.

Again, you moron....

R.L. — 1/25/2004 8:40:26 PM (archived)

If i were wanting a camerafor vacation snpshots yeah- I would return it...

If I wanted to learn about an alien planet I would choose something that gave me usefull data... can you get it through your skull that what the human eye sees is NOTHING compared to what our instruments can see?

why the hell are you so obsessed with this?! the pictures tell us more than we could see with our eyes... so what if the hues are wrong? the instruments on the rover can see far more than our eyes can... lichens etc (very unlikely) will be FAR more obvious to other instruments than our eyes...

The fact you consider the human eye to be conclusive evidence shows you to be ignorant...

The whole thread (28 posts)

Color shot on the NASA channel... - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 10:19:40 AM
- re: Voila! - Raoul - 1/25/2004 11:04:50 AM
  - Did It Land In A Crater? - Mark Eby - 1/25/2004 3:55:41 PM
    - Duh Again, Need To Start On Older Posts (n/t) - Mark Eby - 1/25/2004 3:58:58 PM
  - Colors still not correct. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 3:15:40 PM
    - Oh, Shut Up! It has been explained to you several times! - R.L. - 1/25/2004 5:20:55 PM
      - It is easy to get an image with the right colors. Why not do it? - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 5:50:15 PM
        
        re: It is easy to get an image with the right colors. Why not do it? - Johannes - 1/25/2004 7:32:09 PM
        
        It isnt easy, or even possible, Bob - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:21:35 PM
        
        Oh, and here is an unrelated fact about the eye that I bet no one here will believe: - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:27:46 PM
        
        Does that mean you would be happy with a digital camera that changed a blue NASA logo into red? (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:26:25 PM
        
        No, Bob- But the camera on the rover is not for holiday snapshots - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:48:28 PM
        
        PART of the reason for putting filters on the rover in the visible spectrum is the public giving the colors of Mars. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 7:03:55 PM
        
        Chlorophyll is far more unmistakeable in the 'invisible' part of the spectrum - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:19:08 PM
        
        There are some type of lichen for which chlorophyll is not visible. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 7:49:32 PM
        
        Bob, you need more patience. - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 8:33:49 PM
        
        So you think white is a spectral color? (n/t) - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:11:43 PM
        
        An example for Bob - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:57:35 PM
        
        re: An example for Bob - Johannes - 1/25/2004 7:59:12 PM
        
        and another - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:09:52 PM
        
        I agree that a camera can pick more detail than the human eye. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 8:00:07 PM
        
        Again, you moron.... - R.L. - 1/25/2004 8:40:26 PM
        
        Gee, Bob- maybe they are busy doing real science? - R.L. - 1/25/2004 5:58:59 PM
        
        It's JUST as easy to release the correct color image as the wrong one. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:15:21 PM
        
        No it isnt- see above (n/t) - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:51:05 PM
        
        Polly want a cracker! Polly want a cracker! (n/t) - Polly - 1/25/2004 5:58:09 PM
        
        Right back at ya, bud. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:18:45 PM
  - re: Voila! - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 11:27:15 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (28 posts)