There are some type of lichen for which chlorophyll is not visible.

Space/Science » in reply to Chlorophyll is far more unmistakeable in the 'invisible' part of the spectrum

There are some type of lichen for which chlorophyll is not visible.

Robert Clark — 1/25/2004 7:49:32 PM (archived)

You need to find out if there are green or blue patches on rocks before you can investigate what is the cause of them.
Even purely mineralogical green/blue patches on rocks would be important scientifically.

Bob Clark

The whole thread (28 posts)

Color shot on the NASA channel... - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 10:19:40 AM
- re: Voila! - Raoul - 1/25/2004 11:04:50 AM
  - Did It Land In A Crater? - Mark Eby - 1/25/2004 3:55:41 PM
    - Duh Again, Need To Start On Older Posts (n/t) - Mark Eby - 1/25/2004 3:58:58 PM
  - Colors still not correct. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 3:15:40 PM
    - Oh, Shut Up! It has been explained to you several times! - R.L. - 1/25/2004 5:20:55 PM
      - It is easy to get an image with the right colors. Why not do it? - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 5:50:15 PM
        
        re: It is easy to get an image with the right colors. Why not do it? - Johannes - 1/25/2004 7:32:09 PM
        
        It isnt easy, or even possible, Bob - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:21:35 PM
        
        Oh, and here is an unrelated fact about the eye that I bet no one here will believe: - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:27:46 PM
        
        Does that mean you would be happy with a digital camera that changed a blue NASA logo into red? (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:26:25 PM
        
        No, Bob- But the camera on the rover is not for holiday snapshots - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:48:28 PM
        
        PART of the reason for putting filters on the rover in the visible spectrum is the public giving the colors of Mars. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 7:03:55 PM
        
        Chlorophyll is far more unmistakeable in the 'invisible' part of the spectrum - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:19:08 PM
        
        There are some type of lichen for which chlorophyll is not visible. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 7:49:32 PM
        
        Bob, you need more patience. - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 8:33:49 PM
        
        So you think white is a spectral color? (n/t) - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:11:43 PM
        
        An example for Bob - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:57:35 PM
        
        re: An example for Bob - Johannes - 1/25/2004 7:59:12 PM
        
        and another - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:09:52 PM
        
        I agree that a camera can pick more detail than the human eye. - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 8:00:07 PM
        
        Again, you moron.... - R.L. - 1/25/2004 8:40:26 PM
        
        Gee, Bob- maybe they are busy doing real science? - R.L. - 1/25/2004 5:58:59 PM
        
        It's JUST as easy to release the correct color image as the wrong one. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:15:21 PM
        
        No it isnt- see above (n/t) - R.L. - 1/25/2004 6:51:05 PM
        
        Polly want a cracker! Polly want a cracker! (n/t) - Polly - 1/25/2004 5:58:09 PM
        
        Right back at ya, bud. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/25/2004 6:18:45 PM
  - re: Voila! - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 11:27:15 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (28 posts)