re: oh...that JMS....

Space/Science » in reply to re: Stereo image pairs animation 'n' stuff

JMS — 2/22/2004 12:05:34 AM (archived)

Okay, now I understand. Knew it was an inside joke of some kind, good to know. Don't worry, lots of my humour is either so sublte as to be undectable, or way too smart-ass for my own good. Keep 'em coming.

The whole thread (14 posts)

How many people prefer anaglyphs for stereo viewing of rover images? - Robert - 2/20/2004 4:46:19 PM
- Stereo image pairs. - JMS - 2/21/2004 5:49:23 AM
  - re: Stereo image pairs. - Robert - 2/21/2004 4:39:28 PM
    - re: Stereo image pairs animation 'n' stuff - JMS - 2/21/2004 9:00:23 PM
      - re: Stereo image pairs animation 'n' stuff - Robert - 2/21/2004 11:16:29 PM
        
        re: oh...that JMS.... - JMS - 2/22/2004 12:05:34 AM
      - re: Grand Canyon - Raoul - 2/21/2004 9:29:22 PM
- re: How many people prefer anaglyphs for stereo viewing of rover images? - Doug Ellison - 2/20/2004 10:05:43 PM
  - strange coincidences and stranger anaglyphs - Robert - 2/21/2004 12:17:05 AM
    - re: strange coincidences and stranger anaglyphs - Doug Ellison - 2/22/2004 12:53:22 PM
- When will somebody invent a monitor that can emit simultaneous differently polarized images? (n/t) - alcaray - 2/20/2004 8:38:32 PM
  - Don't need it.. Try this... - Nick Hoffman - 2/21/2004 3:49:16 AM
    - YES ! - JMS - 2/21/2004 4:57:52 AM
- re: How many people prefer anaglyphs for stereo viewing of rover images? - kosmo - 2/20/2004 5:07:14 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)