Thank you, Donald. And to make the point even stronger, in 1972 a large meteor streaked through Earth's atmosphere over western North America in broad daylight and back out into space. This obviously unannounced event was still witnessed by a US military spysat, thousands of people, many photos were taken, and at least one hand-held motion picture camera recorded the event. And note this was in 1972, before the advent of small, inexpensive videocams and digital cameras.
Yet somehow giant alien ships that hover over cities get claims of many witnesses and some bad photos, but no proof. You want evidence that aliens exist? This latter point is not the way to do it.
Here are some Web sites for the 1972 bolide I am referring to:
http://comets.amsmeteors.org/meteors/1972.html
http://www.aero.org/publications/crosslink/summer2000/03.html
http://www.maa.agleia.de/Comet/Other/1972.html
Space/Science » in reply to Wrong
re: Wrong
The whole thread (45 posts)
- What alternative explanations might apply to Mexico's recent UFO claims? (online video clip included)
- TEST (I see no text box for 'reply', Netscape 6, I-mac 9.0.4) (n/t)
- A MUCH MORE IMPORTANT QUESTION:
- Another popular Mexico video....
- Thermal inversions or sensor ghosts
- re: What alternative explanations might apply to Mexico's recent UFO claims? (online video clip included)
- They've been with us for quite some time.
- We won the Footfall war (n/t)
- the unspoken problem with pilots as observers
- Iranians are seein' 'em too. (n/t)
- Alternative to what? So far I see no explanation at all. Nobody has bothered to investigate. (n/t)
- Perhaps the U.S. govt. has finally created basically invisible aircraft?