Current Events » in reply to re: first net job loss since Hoover. Not quite accurate.

The whole thread (15 posts)

• The employment numbers are out, and stronger than predicted - ebnelson - 9/3/2004 1:14:48 PM
  • I heard an interesting factoid last night - Larry J - 9/3/2004 7:05:31 PM
  • re: Stronger than predicted by whom? When is the "correct" scheduled for? Midnight Sunday? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/3/2004 4:21:58 PM
  • Numbers are good, but economists had been hoping for 150,000. - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 2:14:52 PM
    • "Disappointing" - Mark Eby - 9/3/2004 10:58:27 PM
      • Remember last spring? - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2004 12:00:23 AM
        • That News Wasn't Buried - Mark Eby - 9/4/2004 2:47:21 AM
          • re: That News Wasn't Buried - gbaikie - 9/4/2004 6:48:20 AM
    • What's the spin on the first net job loss since Hoover? - Bowser - 9/3/2004 5:56:01 PM
      • re: first net job loss since Hoover. Not quite accurate. - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 7:27:43 PM
        • re: first net job loss since Hoover. Not quite accurate. - Chris Vancil - 9/4/2004 8:52:14 AM
        • Wondered what the spin was. I knew I could count on you. And - - - - Bowser - 9/3/2004 9:00:17 PM
        • Don't go messing up their spin and slander with facts, Tom (n/t) - ebnelson - 9/3/2004 7:43:21 PM
    • Dems were hoping for less than 100,000. 144,000 is within margin of error. - ebnelson - 9/3/2004 4:14:03 PM
  • 144,000 Jobs Added in August; Unemployment Rate Dips to 5.4% - REB - 9/3/2004 1:40:23 PM