"Politically, I'm angered because most (though not all) of this silliness is emanating from the self-proclaimed Left. We're witnessing here a profound historical volte-face. For most of the past two centuries, the Left has been identified with science and against obscurantism; we have believed that rational thought and the fearless analysis of objective reality (both natural and social) are incisive tools for combating the mystifications promoted by the powerful -- not to mention being desirable human ends in their own right. The recent turn of many ``progressive'' or ``leftist'' academic humanists and social scientists toward one or another form of epistemic relativism betrays this worthy heritage and undermines the already fragile prospects for progressive social critique. Theorizing about ``the social construction of reality'' won't help us find an effective treatment for AIDS or devise strategies for preventing global warming. Nor can we combat false ideas in history, sociology, economics and politics if we reject the notions of truth and falsity. "
http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/lingua_franca_v4/lingua_franca_v4.html
Flame » in reply to The word you looking for is skepticism, Left lack of practice in cynicism
re: The word you looking for is skepticism, Left isn't lacking in the practice in cynicism
The whole thread (36 posts)
- The problem with the Left is more mental laziness than anything else.
- re: So your whining about the liberal media is what great thinking? The problem with the right is it's inability to even think as something less than a monolith. (n/t)
- re: Liberals are always more thoughtful than conservatives
- Oof!
- The problem with the left is it's continual ......
- re: The problem with the Left is it doesn't practise cynicism the way the right does (n/t)
- This coming from the land of black and white.
- re: The problem with the Left is more mental laziness than anything else.
