It certainly isn't up to any of us to decide the issues that either campaign thinks are important. We can discuss things all we want, but it's up to the campaigns to stress what they think is important.
Don't blame me if the inept idiots who run the Kerry campaign keep harping on events that happened over 30 years ago, like their "Fortunate Son" ad just released yesterday. It's so patently stupid that it's funny, but if this is the hill they're willing to die on, I'm perfectly willing to watch.
Besides, Bowser has been harping on irrelevant, illogical, and often incorrect stuff for a long time. Now, he suddenly wants to be taken seriously? Sorry, but his credibility is even lower than Dan Rather's.
Flame » in reply to Bowser 5. Conservative wolf-pack 0.
It's up to the campaigns to discuss the issues it thinks are important
The whole thread (44 posts)
- Check CE, and tell me the conservatives don't love negative campaigning, hate dealing with issues. (n/t)
- Funny How You Forget Your Own Posts (n/t)
- Bowser 5. Conservative wolf-pack 0.
- I did address it...
- It's up to the campaigns to discuss the issues it thinks are important
- I should not have to point out the this thread is not about the campaign
- hmm
- I like elephants (n/t)
- The point
- re: The point
- hmm
- I should not have to point out the this thread is not about the campaign
- Modern math at work.
- What decade was it you last dealt in facts?
- Oddly, it only seems to be "negative campaigning" when the Left is taking it in the chops. (n/t)
- Here's what the Kerry campaign thinks is a real issue
- For someone who complains about the other guy whining all the time (n/t)
- Conservatives? What's Chris, a Whig? (n/t)
