Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to Your analysis doesn't take into account that the publication is neither leftist nor liberal, but conservative conservative conservative.

re: Your analysis doesn't take into account that the publication is neither leftist nor liberal, but conservative conservative conservative.

"Presumably, the author has spent four years trying to believe that Bush is good for the country but still he comes up short. "

As I've said before, Bush foreign policy is liberal- as was his Dad's. He believes the the UN is a good thing [obviously flawed but fixable]. He probably even thinks that a single world govt could be a good idea. He believes that the US national security interest lies in the direction that more countries become democratic [it's in our nation security interest to do something that brings this about]. This is not a conservative view- and certainty is not a "conservative conservative conservative" view. As I said there is a reason why Bush and Blair agree- they have a similar POV.

Without going down the route of nihilism how much more Liberal in his foreign policy could Bush possibly get? [joke].

That a "conservative conservative conservative" has more in common with a nihilist isn't surprising- both think this existance is doomed, doomed, doomed- and Denial is their drinking buddy.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (20 posts)