Besdies, Buchanan is the only one of the group who endorsed Bush. In a kind of upside down way, that really does make him an oracle to the liberals: if Buchanan endorses Bush, some of the scariness factor (which I confess I already have when I look at Bush) rubs off.
I know all about the Constitution Party. I go to gun shows. They always have a table. I visit it to conduct research in cultural anthropology.
If you were in a red state and you could be somewhat assured that a Satani -- I mean, liberal wouldn't win, would you cast a protest vote for a minority candidate? What does that make the votes for the Libertarian candidate and for staying home? Nutballs as well?
Don't talk to me about stereotypes. Where do I keep reading that liberals and Communists are approximately equivalent?
Current Events » in reply to No. And this clarifies that a lot of liberals really have no idea what conservatism is all about.
Calling Pat Buchanan "scary" is putting him on a pedestal?
The whole thread (20 posts)
- A Kerry endorsement
- re: And put John Edwards a heartbeat away from the Presidency?
- re: A Kerry endorsement
- Your analysis doesn't take into account that the publication is neither leftist nor liberal, but conservative conservative conservative.
- A Bush endorsement
- I don't see an important trend here...
- Bush has behaved like a caricature of what a right-wing president is supposed to be
- Read Zel Miller's (D, GA) Comments? (n/t)
