That even the most intelligent liberals here still swim in a sea of stereotypes is telling.
This magazine represents a fringe group of conservatives. Repeat: a fringe group. They are isolationist on foreign policy, believe Israel should be allowed to go to hell, think our borders should be closed entirely and the Mexicans kicked out, support massive trade protection, and a number of other things that a lot of other Republicans don't believe.
That two of these people support the Constitution Party doesn't seem to bother you. Their platform is here. Go ahead. Browse a bit.
The fact that these people don't approve of Bush should be an immense relief to liberals. Imagine what things would be like if Bush was "their boy."
It's fascinating how liberals are putting previous "right-wing nutballs" like Pat Buchanan and Pat Robertson up on pedestals as oracles now that they're saying things you want to hear. However, Democrats like Zell Miller are still apparently dangerous lunatics.
Current Events » in reply to Your analysis doesn't take into account that the publication is neither leftist nor liberal, but conservative conservative conservative.
No. And this clarifies that a lot of liberals really have no idea what conservatism is all about.
The whole thread (20 posts)
- A Kerry endorsement
- re: And put John Edwards a heartbeat away from the Presidency?
- re: A Kerry endorsement
- Your analysis doesn't take into account that the publication is neither leftist nor liberal, but conservative conservative conservative.
- A Bush endorsement
- I don't see an important trend here...
- Bush has behaved like a caricature of what a right-wing president is supposed to be
- Read Zel Miller's (D, GA) Comments? (n/t)
