For all of you apologists for this messy, unnecessary war (the one that had nothing to do with WMD or connections to 9/11).......may the souls of each and every Iraqi mother and child tread into your dreams of fiscal and financial security. May you feel blessed that your president has yet to denounce his actions and that he has the right to continue the slaughter of innocents to make us "safe".
May you feel secure and content that any muslim killed was a terrorist, and that any young American life that was sacrificed was not in the name of our national security, but for your vain sense of self and the sound bites that deaden your moral responsibility to other living beings.
Current Events » in reply to Critical analysis of the Lancet study
World Trade Centers=3,000 Iraq=10,000 What's wrong with these numbers
The whole thread (23 posts)
- Stephen Hawking to Lead Anti-War Protest on Election Day
- Stephen Hawking is entitled to his opinion, but I daresay that he is mistaken about this matter. (n/t)
- Hawk was wrong about information & black holes and is wrong here outside his expertise as well (n/t)
- re: Why read only 5,000 names if the death count is 100,000?
- Don't you get tired of asking dumb questions, Scott?
- Where are the bodies? The entire thing is based on an iffy sampling. (n/t)
- re: Ok then publish a list.
- re: re:The Lancet
- I haven't seen any real refutation of the Lancet study
- Critical analysis of the Lancet study
- re: Will Uday and Qsay's names be read aloud on the list of Iraqi victims?
- Don't you get tired of asking dumb questions, Scott?
