I'm betting less than 10,000 Iraqi's have been killed...I'll even let you count the Syrian and Iranians who have flooded into the battle zones among the Iraqi dead, and I bet you couldn't come up with a list of more names.
If you can't even produce a list of names, let alone the time, place, method of death, and method of remains disposal, then forget it: Your sources are making the deaths up.
In law there is a thing called a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Polling and extrapolation figures aren't enough to convict anyone for an important reason (you can't disprove a negative). They didn't even try to do pull that trick at Nuremburg where it would have been easy to do so.
I suggest trying to find better news sources.
Scott Evil
Current Events » in reply to I haven't seen any real refutation of the Lancet study
re: Will Uday and Qsay's names be read aloud on the list of Iraqi victims?
The whole thread (23 posts)
- Stephen Hawking to Lead Anti-War Protest on Election Day
- Stephen Hawking is entitled to his opinion, but I daresay that he is mistaken about this matter. (n/t)
- Hawk was wrong about information & black holes and is wrong here outside his expertise as well (n/t)
- re: Why read only 5,000 names if the death count is 100,000?
- Don't you get tired of asking dumb questions, Scott?
- Where are the bodies? The entire thing is based on an iffy sampling. (n/t)
- re: Ok then publish a list.
- re: re:The Lancet
- I haven't seen any real refutation of the Lancet study
- Critical analysis of the Lancet study
- re: Will Uday and Qsay's names be read aloud on the list of Iraqi victims?
- Don't you get tired of asking dumb questions, Scott?
