I do not say, and I did not say, and I never will say that "conservatives are for everyone having the bomb."
Sorry. Somehow I must have misinterpreted the phrase "Current conservatives don't care for non-prolif."
And there's a difference between saying "everyone having bombs is okay," and "certain nations building nukes is not worth going to war over."
My list of nations that simply cannot be allowed to possess nuclear weapons is quite short. My list of nations that we would really rather did not possess nuclear weapons is somewhat longer. And there are several nations, such as the U.S., Britain, and even France, whose possession of a nuclear arsenal doesn't bother me at all, and in fact has added to the safety of the world over the past fifty years.
Current Events » in reply to re: Non-proliferation
re: Non-proliferation
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Well thank God that darn test ban treaty isn't holding us back any more
- Try getting your treaties straight
- Are we talking about the same treaty?
- Putin is talking about a new missile system, not necessarily a new warhead
- Are we talking about the same treaty?
- Try getting your treaties straight