Current Events » in reply to "Increase in Iraq force is likely" - Probably 'cause we're winning.

The whole thread (33 posts)

• "Increase in Iraq force is likely" - Probably 'cause we're winning. - Bowser - 11/22/2004 6:07:07 AM
  • They increased forces in Afghanistan before the election, too. - Tom Brosz - 11/22/2004 4:40:54 PM
  • What to believe: That we are determined to exterminate the terrorists quickly and then get out. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 11/22/2004 3:57:52 PM
    • Ewww!! DFM says 'Exterminate the terrorists" - Lindy - 11/22/2004 5:01:21 PM
      • Since you honor me so much - ebnelson - 11/22/2004 7:18:53 PM
      • These are Saddam's old henchmen and Al Qaeda. They are utterly opposed to democracy and elections. - David F Mayer - 11/22/2004 5:31:51 PM
        • Guess what? Iraqis still hate Israel, adn they still hate the US - E.P. Grondine - 11/23/2004 6:46:22 AM
        • "Iraq deserves freedom and will get it." DFM - Lindy - 11/23/2004 4:04:49 AM
      • "...there weren't any 'insurgents' before GWB started this illegal and useless war." - Tom Brosz - 11/22/2004 5:31:20 PM
        • re: "...there weren't any 'insurgents' before GWB started this illegal and useless war." - Lindy - 11/23/2004 3:58:37 AM
        • Saddam killed hundreds of thousands of people he suspected of opposing his regime. That is cool with Lindy, apparently. - ebnelson - 11/22/2004 7:20:33 PM
        • You asked: "Do you want them back in charge?" Lindy probably does! It fits with her leftist totalitarianism. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 11/22/2004 5:32:59 PM
          • No, I actually don't think she does. - Tom Brosz - 11/22/2004 5:53:16 PM
            • We have a choice: Leave and let the Ba'thists take over again, beginning the mass murder industry again, or stay and set up a democratic government. There is no middle ground. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 11/22/2004 8:49:22 PM
              • It would be a lot cheaper.......... - Lindy - 11/23/2004 4:10:19 AM
                • Yeah, as Bowser might say, they're only Muslims. - Tom Brosz - 11/23/2004 4:20:49 AM
                  • As Bowser properly describes your attitude, that is. He regards them as human beings. (n/t) - Bowser - 11/23/2004 3:31:46 PM
                    • Then why do you want the head-choppers to win? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/23/2004 4:35:55 PM
  • Sacrificial lambs......... - Lindy - 11/22/2004 6:36:51 AM
    • I'm thinking both of you badly need some sort of filter on your internet connection. - Tom Brosz - 11/22/2004 4:54:11 PM
      • That "source" - Lindy - 11/22/2004 5:10:05 PM
      • Hmmm...should have been under Jack's post. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/22/2004 4:54:54 PM
    • The children are the lambs once again. - Jack Herer - 11/22/2004 4:35:29 PM
      • Does no one care about the innocent children? - Lindy - 11/22/2004 5:14:59 PM
        • Lindy. We didn't turn the desert into glass. - Tom Brosz - 11/22/2004 10:11:24 PM
          • It's not over yet.............. (n/t) - Lindy - 11/23/2004 4:11:30 AM
          • Reductio ad absurdum (n/t) - LJ - 11/22/2004 11:01:20 PM
            • Guess it was over your head, too. - Tom Brosz - 11/23/2004 3:34:19 AM
              • re: Guess it was over your head, too. - Lindy - 11/23/2004 4:15:32 AM
                • How do you know the insurgency is growing at all? - Tom Brosz - 11/23/2004 4:28:12 AM
                  • How do you know all the insurgents are Baathists? - LJ - 11/23/2004 6:20:57 AM
                    • Wait: They're supposedly 'all' Baathists now? I thought all of them were 'Foreign Terrorists' - Davin L. - 11/23/2004 7:14:37 PM
                      • Toms justifications are rather fluid - R.L. - 11/24/2004 1:52:19 AM