I suggested that NASA was behaving in a traditionally mediocre manner by not sending us more color pictures for all the money we were forced at gunpoint to give it. In a desperate attempt to belittle someone (perhaps as overcompensation regarding unclean teeth?) you state I was conspiracy-mongering specifically about some urge to refrain from sending color photos. My response was that if a conspiracy's involved, it's that of keeping competitors from being able to do a better job. Your response has been that I'm a troll. In the USA when folks say profanities, others say "wash your mouth out with soap". To you I merely say "brusheth thine teeth".
You went on to say: "There is no company on the planet that would answer a call for a competative prize to land a rover on mars. Only one body has every succesfully done it, and only one body has a chance of doing it again - and that's NASA/JPL."
As for part 1: You have NO idea what you're talking about when making such an arrogantly sweeping assertion about folks in a country where you don't even live. Our countries are so very different, just a look at our teeth helps prove it. As for part 2, the lack of prizes is to blame for that, NOT potential prize contestants' supposed mediocrity.
I'm willing to bet that you live off of tax dollars, or tax pounds. Folks in the private sector wouldn't get away with being so wasteful for long. I am through wasting time with your insults. Goodbye.
Space/Science » in reply to re: It was an analogy, not an objection. Much remains to be invented BY COMPETITIVE PRIZE CONTESTANTS.
Learn to read and others' postings won't be so offensive.
The whole thread (41 posts)
- Some interesting Rover pics (embedded in post)
- Would color photos really have been that much more resource-consuming?
- here's one from last week
- Thanks. I wonder why NASA doesn't transmit more though.
- re: Thanks. I wonder why NASA doesn't transmit more though.
- Once MRO is in place, data tranmission from Mars should be greatly increased. (n/t)
- Pathfinder cost many times LESS & used much older technology.
- re: Pathfinder cost many times LESS & used much older technology.
- re:stupidest conspiracy theory ever
- You don't think LockMart and JPL fear competitive prizes' implications?
- re: You don't think LockMart and JPL fear competitive prizes' implications
- MSL pix: And video! (n/t)
- 2004 cellphones offer it for a fraction of the cost. Why no Mars prizes yet?
- When we have buried mars in telecom sats and microwave towers and copper and silicon cables...
- Last time I tried, my cell phone didn't work on mars
- Won't the 2009 mission already have its relaying network intact?
- re: Won't the 2009 mission already have its relaying network intact?
- Prizes permit economies of scale; and litigation-aversive R&D isn't needed (unlike w/ cars)
- re: Won't the 2009 mission already have its relaying network intact?
- re: Won't the 2009 mission already have its relaying network intact?
- Won't the 2009 mission already have its relaying network intact?
- 2004 cellphones offer it for a fraction of the cost. Why no Mars prizes yet?
- MSL pix: And video! (n/t)
- re: You don't think LockMart and JPL fear competitive prizes' implications
- You don't think LockMart and JPL fear competitive prizes' implications?
- I know what you mean
- re: Thanks. I wonder why NASA doesn't transmit more though.
- Thanks. I wonder why NASA doesn't transmit more though.
- here's one from last week
- Would color photos really have been that much more resource-consuming?
