I can lead you to water I can't make you drink.
Eric says NASA sanitized photos;
Eric: "Nasa was instructed to sanitize the photo's for the public that would suggest modern humans were not the first to
be there."
Then you say that that is just a story;
JimO: "We hear this a lot, but the stories never seem to stand up to close inspection. Want to try another set of stories,
Eric? What's the proof for your assertion."
Then I offer Apollo 11 photos that show stars in the back round of space when compared to the same official photo the official released photos do not have stars in "sky". That makes sanitized a ok word. That is the word that you where objecting to was it not?
BUT
My photo posted was to a java link so the picture doesn't turn up so you though your hands up in the air.
Maybe you just don't need to reply about it.
Fine.
I was not off topic.
I was looking to you for an answer.
Space/Science » in reply to re: the truth
re: the truth
The whole thread (62 posts)
- Conspiracy Moon Landing rebroadcast on National Geographic Channel January 15
- the truth
- re: the truth [Why are we tolerating psuedoscience on the Space Board???]
- Actually Eric,
- Dueling moonbat conspiracy theories
- re: the truth
- Truth for who?
- "This lie or cover-up benifets the oil industry greatly"
- the truth really is
- the truth
