...when the Truth is supposedly hidden? Who's to say it's deception? Some is doubtless old-style misinformation but if there was anything to electrogravity we'd see it in use now. Conspiracy theories are horse-shit because there's no way of verifying any and every loony and not-so-loony bit of paranoiac speculation.
There was a series of books by "Commander X" which claimed the DoD was in cohoots with the Devil - disguised as little Grey aliens, of course - and it was all a demonic conspiracy. What separates that sort of nut-job reasoning from less loopy claims about recovered saucers at Roswell and the like?
In the whole "Conspiracy Industry" - which is what it is, a collusion of cynical and/or delluded publishers and their caged loonies - there is no way of distinguishing one theory from another, one more outrageous claim from another. Hence I have had a gut-full of such meaningless pissing in the wind and I am waiting for all you Saucer-Nuts and UFoologists to produce some HARD evidence.
I am sure I speak for 99% of us here, writers and lurkers alike.
Adam
Space/Science » in reply to re: Truth for who?
How do you expose a lie...
The whole thread (62 posts)
- Conspiracy Moon Landing rebroadcast on National Geographic Channel January 15
- the truth
- re: the truth [Why are we tolerating psuedoscience on the Space Board???]
- Actually Eric,
- Dueling moonbat conspiracy theories
- re: the truth
- Truth for who?
- "This lie or cover-up benifets the oil industry greatly"
- the truth really is
- the truth