I see no proof af the claim aside from a crudely photoshopped image... I see no picture of an ear piece, no evidence that it was anything more than wrinkles in his jacket. Lets look at a few things that you should have asked yourself before jumping on board with this conspiracy theory.
1) If this subterfuge was done, then wouldn't you think that the leader of the free world, president of the most technologically advanced country, with nearly limitless resources, dont you think he could do it in a FAR more subtle way- an undetectable way?
2) If he had succeeded he would have had a modest advantage... If the subterfuge had failed he would have a disaster - it would likely cost him the election... WHY take that risk?
3) Do you think his performance in the debates was unnaturally good? Good god, I remember feeling embarrassment FOR him many times in the debates- even your own article you linked pointed out that he seemed off balance.
4) DUDE its over- the idiot won, even if the silly conspiracy is true, is that the crime you want to emphasize?! I would be more upset about a war on false pretenses, false imprisonment of people without evidence, HUGE deficits.... the list goes on and on....
Current Events » in reply to So We Have the NYT Avoiding an "October Surprise" Story for Fear of What Republicans Might Say
Al, chill! This is silly
The whole thread (31 posts)
- So We Have the NYT Avoiding an "October Surprise" Story for Fear of What Republicans Might Say
- Al, chill! This is silly
- The analysis is at least as good as the analysis of UFO abduction claims. (n/t)
- Or possibly, the NYT decided that the story was full of hot air?
- Cripes, alcaray. I didn't think you were in this category.
