Your position is clear

Current Events » in reply to Al, use common sense!

Your position is clear

alcaray — 2/11/2005 4:44:59 PM (archived)

You think that (rather well-sourced) video that basicly everyone in the country can vouch for is equivalent to the (out of left field) pics used to justify "rods" and "saucers".

And, without any sort of confirmation that I have heard of, you think that Dr. Nelson is a photo-shop-using kook.

I'm not willing to make those leaps. I hope my position is clear.

The whole thread (31 posts)

So We Have the NYT Avoiding an "October Surprise" Story for Fear of What Republicans Might Say - alcaray - 2/9/2005 12:07:48 AM
- Al, chill! This is silly - R.L. - 2/10/2005 6:32:02 AM
  - I don't have a lot of time for this - alcaray - 2/10/2005 6:54:57 PM
    - Al, use common sense! - R.L. - 2/11/2005 5:24:33 AM
      - Common sense. - Bowser - 2/12/2005 4:22:34 AM
      - Your position is clear - alcaray - 2/11/2005 4:44:59 PM
    - With all respect - ebnelson - 2/10/2005 7:38:52 PM
      - Last time: I have not said word one about any other claim except that of Dr. Nelson. - alcaray - 2/10/2005 8:50:54 PM
        
        The claims all meld together into internet goo. - ebnelson - 2/11/2005 5:29:12 AM
- The analysis is at least as good as the analysis of UFO abduction claims. (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 5:23:11 PM
  - President Bush is really an alien - David F Mayer - 2/9/2005 6:07:03 PM
    - What do you think it is? - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 10:40:26 PM
      - My guess is the back fastening of a bullet proof vest. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/10/2005 2:51:43 PM
      - A desperate attempt of a few leftists to try and scrape up some remnants of self-esteem? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/10/2005 4:25:24 AM
- Or possibly, the NYT decided that the story was full of hot air? - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 1:44:41 PM
  - Ed, you really need to make better use of the Flame board. (n/t) - SDG - 2/9/2005 3:57:15 PM
    - There is no flame in my response. - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 5:24:35 PM
- Cripes, alcaray. I didn't think you were in this category. - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 1:47:53 AM
  - The analysis does not sound like it was done by crackpots to me - alcaray - 2/9/2005 4:06:01 PM
    - This needs "analysis?" What am I, a frigging flyswatter? - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 6:45:47 PM
      - The best analysis was done months ago... - Larry J - 2/9/2005 7:46:59 PM
        
        Thanks for a cogent reply - alcaray - 2/9/2005 8:09:19 PM
        
        Getting into UFO territory now - R.L. - 2/10/2005 4:26:01 PM
        
        An expert in one field is often uninformed on other subjects - Larry J - 2/9/2005 10:03:34 PM
        
        there is a punchline here somewhere..... (n/t) - Tony - 2/9/2005 10:05:31 PM
        
        re: NASA - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 9:50:38 PM
        
        You don't have to look if you don't want to (n/t) - alcaray - 2/9/2005 10:13:45 PM
        
        Geez, where's R.L. when you really need him? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 10:30:29 PM
      - No, the analysis was done. I only hoped someone would comment on it. - alcaray - 2/9/2005 7:13:09 PM
        
        That claim was not 'analysis'. That claim is bogus pap hiding in the words of analysis. (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 7:46:18 PM
  - Are you kidding? He's a left wing pavlovian dog (n/t) - p - 2/9/2005 2:23:12 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (31 posts)