Okay, assuming you're not just pulling everyone's leg:
The New York Times did not print this because the entire "hump under the coat" story is the product of the same kind of psychosis and the same kind of photographic technique that has Hoagland seeing cities on Mars.
I've heard similar crackpots insisting it was a defibrillator.
I myself thought it was just part of his bulletproof vest, and showed a photo of a similar vest with rectangular plates in it.
Bush's tailor had yet another theory. But what the hell would he know about it.
What seems to be the most important thing about this whole flap is the nearly frantic attempt by Democrats to convince themselves that they didn't get the shit kicked out of them by a leader that they cannot conceive as being anything other than a complete idiot.
He beat Kerry by three million votes, despite the best attempts of the Democrats, most of the media, and others through the entire year of 2004. And guess what: he does his own thinking.
Deal with it.
Current Events » in reply to So We Have the NYT Avoiding an "October Surprise" Story for Fear of What Republicans Might Say
Cripes, alcaray. I didn't think you were in this category.
The whole thread (31 posts)
- So We Have the NYT Avoiding an "October Surprise" Story for Fear of What Republicans Might Say
- Al, chill! This is silly
- The analysis is at least as good as the analysis of UFO abduction claims. (n/t)
- Or possibly, the NYT decided that the story was full of hot air?
- Cripes, alcaray. I didn't think you were in this category.