re: NASA

Current Events » in reply to Thanks for a cogent reply

re: NASA

Tom Brosz — 2/9/2005 9:50:38 PM (archived)

I'm sorry, I must have missed the law of nature that says a NASA scientist can't be a kook. Or Atkinson, for that matter.

The amount of work that has gone into this is astonishing. Anything...ANYTHING to somehow try and prove that Bush could not possibly have legitimately won an election.

Look, if it salvages some remnants of wounded pride after having a Democratic candidate--who was labeled brilliant and nuanced on the sole evidence of being able to use large words clearly--get his ass kicked by a Texas cowboy, go for it.

Bush is an idiot, controlled by Secret Forces. Feel better now?

God, is this sad.

The whole thread (31 posts)

So We Have the NYT Avoiding an "October Surprise" Story for Fear of What Republicans Might Say - alcaray - 2/9/2005 12:07:48 AM
- Al, chill! This is silly - R.L. - 2/10/2005 6:32:02 AM
  - I don't have a lot of time for this - alcaray - 2/10/2005 6:54:57 PM
    - Al, use common sense! - R.L. - 2/11/2005 5:24:33 AM
      - Common sense. - Bowser - 2/12/2005 4:22:34 AM
      - Your position is clear - alcaray - 2/11/2005 4:44:59 PM
    - With all respect - ebnelson - 2/10/2005 7:38:52 PM
      - Last time: I have not said word one about any other claim except that of Dr. Nelson. - alcaray - 2/10/2005 8:50:54 PM
        
        The claims all meld together into internet goo. - ebnelson - 2/11/2005 5:29:12 AM
- The analysis is at least as good as the analysis of UFO abduction claims. (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 5:23:11 PM
  - President Bush is really an alien - David F Mayer - 2/9/2005 6:07:03 PM
    - What do you think it is? - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 10:40:26 PM
      - My guess is the back fastening of a bullet proof vest. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/10/2005 2:51:43 PM
      - A desperate attempt of a few leftists to try and scrape up some remnants of self-esteem? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/10/2005 4:25:24 AM
- Or possibly, the NYT decided that the story was full of hot air? - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 1:44:41 PM
  - Ed, you really need to make better use of the Flame board. (n/t) - SDG - 2/9/2005 3:57:15 PM
    - There is no flame in my response. - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 5:24:35 PM
- Cripes, alcaray. I didn't think you were in this category. - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 1:47:53 AM
  - The analysis does not sound like it was done by crackpots to me - alcaray - 2/9/2005 4:06:01 PM
    - This needs "analysis?" What am I, a frigging flyswatter? - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 6:45:47 PM
      - The best analysis was done months ago... - Larry J - 2/9/2005 7:46:59 PM
        
        Thanks for a cogent reply - alcaray - 2/9/2005 8:09:19 PM
        
        Getting into UFO territory now - R.L. - 2/10/2005 4:26:01 PM
        
        An expert in one field is often uninformed on other subjects - Larry J - 2/9/2005 10:03:34 PM
        
        there is a punchline here somewhere..... (n/t) - Tony - 2/9/2005 10:05:31 PM
        
        re: NASA - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 9:50:38 PM
        
        You don't have to look if you don't want to (n/t) - alcaray - 2/9/2005 10:13:45 PM
        
        Geez, where's R.L. when you really need him? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 10:30:29 PM
      - No, the analysis was done. I only hoped someone would comment on it. - alcaray - 2/9/2005 7:13:09 PM
        
        That claim was not 'analysis'. That claim is bogus pap hiding in the words of analysis. (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 7:46:18 PM
  - Are you kidding? He's a left wing pavlovian dog (n/t) - p - 2/9/2005 2:23:12 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (31 posts)