re: Analysis of the GCR contribution to climate change.

Space/Science » in reply to Analysis of the GCR contribution to climate change.

re: Analysis of the GCR contribution to climate change.

gbaikie — 5/20/2005 2:52:01 AM (archived)

"The paper also gives the impression that there is no trend in satellite-based temperatures (MSU), which is wrong. There are various analyses of the satellite trends, all of which indicating a warming trend in the troposphere. "

Know any reference to this?

The whole thread (40 posts)

Analysis of the GCR contribution to climate change. - et - 5/19/2005 11:26:31 PM
- re: Analysis of the GCR contribution to climate change. - gbaikie - 5/20/2005 2:52:01 AM
  - here ya go - pwokenyaw - 5/20/2005 4:59:54 PM
    - re: here ya go - gbaikie - 5/20/2005 8:58:18 PM
      - Obviously you don't understand how funny that is. - gbaikie - 5/21/2005 3:15:58 AM
      - re: here ya go - pwokenyaw - 5/20/2005 9:38:50 PM
        
        here we don't go - E.P. Gronddine - 5/21/2005 7:31:18 AM
        
        re: here we don't go - pwokenyaw - 5/23/2005 10:40:34 PM
        
        re: here we don't go - gbaikie - 5/24/2005 1:47:42 AM
        
        care to make this debate more interesting? - pwokenyaw - 5/24/2005 3:18:16 PM
        
        re: care to make this debate more interesting? - gbaikie - 5/25/2005 12:51:12 AM
        
        small-money bets that denialists can still get in on - pwokenyaw - 5/25/2005 7:00:16 AM
        
        re: small-money bets that denialists can still get in on - gbaikie - 5/26/2005 1:40:00 AM
        
        re: small-money bets that denialists can still get in on - pwokenyaw - 5/26/2005 3:21:51 PM
        
        Interesting debate - Tom Brosz - 5/24/2005 4:17:44 PM
        
        Uninteresting rhetoric - et - 5/25/2005 4:35:52 PM
        
        "We know why." No. You don't. - Tom Brosz - 5/26/2005 1:57:21 AM
        
        Well, anyone who doesn't think a warming trend has been established should be interested in my little bets. (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 5/26/2005 3:24:56 PM
        
        re: a warming trend - Tom Brosz - 5/28/2005 8:59:24 PM
        
        re: a warming trend - pwokenyaw - 5/31/2005 10:04:10 PM
        
        re: a warming trend - Tom Brosz - 6/1/2005 5:26:20 PM
        
        re: Uninteresting rhetoric - gbaikie - 5/25/2005 9:10:48 PM
        
        Whoa Nellie..... - et - 5/26/2005 5:39:29 PM
        
        re: Whoa Nellie..... - gbaikie - 5/27/2005 3:38:24 AM
        
        looks like the standard forcing/feedback mistake in your post - pwokenyaw - 5/27/2005 4:44:03 PM
        
        re: looks like the standard forcing/feedback mistake in your post - gbaikie - 5/29/2005 1:54:49 AM
        
        odds are that you would lose - pwokenyaw - 6/2/2005 1:35:41 AM
        
        re: looks like the standard forcing/feedback mistake in your post - gbaikie - 5/27/2005 9:24:00 PM
        
        re: looks like the standard forcing/feedback mistake in your post - pwokenyaw - 5/28/2005 3:28:16 PM
        
        GW - gbaikie - 6/1/2005 5:15:51 AM
        
        lifetime of anthropogenic CO2 - pwokenyaw - 6/1/2005 9:57:56 PM
        
        re: lifetime of anthropogenic CO2 - gbaikie - 6/2/2005 12:55:49 AM
        
        you misread the article - pwokenyaw - 6/2/2005 1:22:43 AM
        
        That's what he does best. - et - 6/2/2005 3:19:54 AM
        
        Ok, so off to Mars - gbaikie - 5/27/2005 12:00:09 PM
        
        re: Ok, so off to Mars - gbaikie - 5/29/2005 3:21:33 AM
        
        re: Whoa Nellie..... - gbaikie - 5/27/2005 3:51:03 AM
- I would expect the CRF to change with time... - R.L. - 5/20/2005 1:10:39 AM
  - Read the linked article. - et - 5/20/2005 2:23:09 AM
    - Yup... I should have read it- I didnt have time... hence the disclaimer I put on my comment... - R.L. - 5/20/2005 4:02:44 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (40 posts)