Tim Lambert Also wrote:
"This year, he has written a paper where he asserts (my emphasis):
-Four alternative predictions of near-future climate, based on empirical models drawn from the palaeoclimatological record, are described. Three agree that the likely trend the 21st century is one of cooling, and the fourth (based on Milankovitch predictions) predicts cooling over the longer term. In keeping with the generality of these predictions, averaged global surface temperature has been falling for the last 6 years.
-
That is, of course, only true if you include the single exceptionally warm 1998 El Nino year. "
http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/cgi-bin/blog/
Of course I imagine [since he is a GW proponent] he doesn't think we are going to be entering a long period of cooling, but he does point out a downward trend and since no one seems to be claiming a drop in CO2 emission during this period, that is more confirmation that CO2 is not a significant factor.
Space/Science » in reply to re: here we don't go
re: here we don't go
The whole thread (40 posts)
- Analysis of the GCR contribution to climate change.
- re: Analysis of the GCR contribution to climate change.
- here ya go
- re: here ya go
- Obviously you don't understand how funny that is.
- re: here ya go
- here we don't go
- re: here we don't go
- re: here we don't go
- care to make this debate more interesting?
- re: care to make this debate more interesting?
- Interesting debate
- Uninteresting rhetoric
- "We know why." No. You don't.
- re: Uninteresting rhetoric
- Uninteresting rhetoric
- care to make this debate more interesting?
- re: here we don't go
- re: here we don't go
- here we don't go
- re: here ya go
- here ya go
- I would expect the CRF to change with time...
- re: Analysis of the GCR contribution to climate change.
