We have oversight of food, health and services and it's a good thing. Are they perfect? Hell no and adjustments are made as the science is applied. Eggs were bad for you, now they are OK as an example.
There are articles from Scientist a few years back saying salt wasn't all that bad for and reducing it to much could lead to health problems and they were right. That's not to say eating all the salt you want is OK, but like all food and drink consumed moderation is the key.
The point I was making is we don't need the Bloombergs telling us how it's going to be. We can take the important information provided to us regarding consumption quantities and make reasonable judgments ourselves based on our bodies and also doctor recommendations as we are not all the same.
In short
The whole thread (48 posts)
- Salt is healthy after all (originally from Comestible Zone)
- Fatal flaw in this.
- For those bent out of shape about the source website:
- The errors, just in your quote:
- What the heck have people done in the past?
- According to the Kellogg's website, Cocoa Crispies' nutritional info is
- Just because you can't taste it doesn't mean its not there.
- Besides...everyone knows...*gluten free* is the new buzz word. :)
- If you actually read the report, you'll find that that web site is brazenly lying about it
- I suppose its possible previous medical advice was based on error.