LINDY: "I can see where you're coming from. And that is ALL crop circles are man made."
MY REPLY: No. You misunderstand. The point is that I have no reason to believe otherwise. If any one crop circle can be man-made, then they all can be man-made.
What causes people to believe they are not man-made is the misbegotten belief that its impossible for people to make these things. But since we've already admitted that crop circles can be man-made, the whole basis for believing otherwise evaporates.
The allusion to "anomalies" is simply a way croppies try to get around the conundrum. But the problem is that "anomalies" don't prove that people didn't make them. And if you can't tell which crop circles are "real" or "fake" based upon the complexity of the design, how do you determine that an anomaly isn't associated with "fake" circles. Perhaps its the anomalies that are ssociated with those crop circles made by people and those "pure" non-anomalous circles are the ones actually made by E.T. Without knowing for certain which type of crop circle is "real" and which type is "fake" to begin with, you can't actually answer the question.
But in reality, the claim of "anomalies" is just vaporware anyway. Its all based upon very bad analysis and overblown rhetoric, as I explain in one of my earlier posts.
Off Topic » in reply to re: Interesting answer
re: Interesting answer
The whole thread (53 posts)
- Lindy: Crop Circle Complexity
- Feast your eyes and mind on June's beauties
- There is no amount of evidence or proof that will get these people to change their minds
- "crop circles"??? Why not fairies and elves? (n/t)
- re: Donald: Crop Circle Complexity
- You want broader discussion here?
- Grabbing Headlines
- It's more about motivation than analysis
