"it didn't have anything to do with torrential rainfall landing in the city."
I see- you think I'm saying torrential rainfall flooded the city? No- here I think is the confusion. Ponchatrain is a watershed for the area. Katrina dumped like a faucet on the whole region (saturated hundreds of square miles with torrential rains), bloating ponchatrain, which in turn flooded the canals, which in turn started topping flood walls.
SELA, btw, was supposed to help prevent that- but probably would have been moot- as I said in my opriginal point. Thats why the levee system was part of SELA. Its not that they were as worried about rain ON NO, but rain causing ponchatrain to flood NO by breaching levess- which is exactly what happened.
Current Events » in reply to re: The storm surge had nothing to do with Ponchatrain(sp) breaching the flood wall
OIC- I think I see the miscommunication WRT the flooding
The whole thread (32 posts)
- My thoughts: Part I
- re: Levees and Floodwalls
- Contingencies and expediency
- Now that I have had more time to read what you wrotew- I see the key issue.
- Notice my post has not laid any blame at any feet, but what are you doing? Springing like a loyal soldier to the defense of your liege.
- SELA
- The storm surge had nothing to do with Ponchatrain(sp) breaching the flood wall
- re: The storm surge had nothing to do with Ponchatrain(sp) breaching the flood wall
- The storm surge had nothing to do with Ponchatrain(sp) breaching the flood wall
- Well considered, well stated...
- re: My thoughts: Part I
- re: Levees and Floodwalls
