Current Events » in reply to Hint#2, the storm surge passed NO early morning of the 29th. The first levee failed in the afternoon of the 29th at the 17th st location

The whole thread (32 posts)

• My thoughts: Part I - DL - 9/10/2005 6:45:27 PM
  • re: Levees and Floodwalls - Tom Brosz - 9/10/2005 11:17:22 PM
    • Contingencies and expediency - Fox - 9/11/2005 3:32:40 AM
      • re: Contingencies and expediency - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 4:15:09 AM
        • re: Contingencies and expediency - Fox - 9/11/2005 2:50:53 PM
          • Historical buildings - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 4:01:29 PM
            • Agreed - Fox - 9/11/2005 4:10:00 PM
    • Now that I have had more time to read what you wrotew- I see the key issue. - DL - 9/11/2005 3:16:08 AM
    • Notice my post has not laid any blame at any feet, but what are you doing? Springing like a loyal soldier to the defense of your liege. - DL - 9/11/2005 12:18:18 AM
      • Cripes, pull the other one. - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 12:40:56 AM
        • Oh, for christ sake- can you cut the BS even for 2 seconds? - DL - 9/11/2005 2:39:46 AM
          • Okay, I'll wait. - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 3:15:27 AM
            • re: Okay, I'll wait. - DL - 9/11/2005 3:18:00 AM
              • Then why the hell did you mention it? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 3:21:04 AM
                • Read the darn post- I say exactly why I mention it - DL - 9/11/2005 3:24:06 AM
    • SELA - Tom Brosz - 9/10/2005 11:30:27 PM
      • The storm surge had nothing to do with Ponchatrain(sp) breaching the flood wall - DL - 9/11/2005 12:17:10 AM
        • re: The storm surge had nothing to do with Ponchatrain(sp) breaching the flood wall - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 12:36:12 AM
          • OIC- I think I see the miscommunication WRT the flooding - DL - 9/11/2005 4:32:27 AM
          • re: It had nothing to do with torrential rainfall - DL - 9/11/2005 3:34:23 AM
            • Hint#2, the storm surge passed NO early morning of the 29th. The first levee failed in the afternoon of the 29th at the 17th st location (n/t) - DL - 9/11/2005 3:46:10 AM
              • re: Actually, 'mid-day' is in two of the references, 'afternoon' in another, so call it 'mid-day' (n/t) - DL - 9/11/2005 3:56:57 AM
                • So what caused the "topping?" - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 4:16:53 AM
                  • Hang on...just read your next post. - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 4:18:31 AM
                    • the canals are connected to ponchatrain - DL - 9/11/2005 4:25:28 AM
                      • I did find this... - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 4:38:13 AM
                        • Pretty sure - DL - 9/11/2005 5:22:17 AM
          • re: Whatever the cause - DL - 9/11/2005 2:41:31 AM
            • Okay... - Tom Brosz - 9/11/2005 3:20:37 AM
              • Again, go back and read the post - DL - 9/11/2005 3:30:10 AM
  • Well considered, well stated... - McFly - 9/10/2005 10:54:04 PM
  • re: My thoughts: Part I - gbaikie - 9/10/2005 9:21:04 PM