re: No, and that is not what this is about

Current Events » in reply to No, and that is not what this is about

re: No, and that is not what this is about

Larry J — 9/12/2005 8:52:15 PM (archived)

Anyone who is trying to score political points out of a natural disaster sucks, IMO. If the shoe fits....

Simply put, there is enough blame for inadequate response to cover both parties at the local, state, and national level. It was a freaking hurricane, not a political event.

The whole thread (31 posts)

How Bush Blew It - Donald - 9/12/2005 1:49:21 PM
- re: How Bush Blew It - Robert - 9/12/2005 11:03:48 PM
- How the Press and the Left continues to blow it - Larry J - 9/12/2005 5:49:11 PM
  - Water - Mary Anne - 9/13/2005 2:21:03 AM
    - re: Water - Tom Brosz - 9/13/2005 5:11:34 AM
      - Not him personally. - Mary Anne - 9/13/2005 11:52:28 AM
        
        See "Response on Responsibility" above. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/13/2005 4:21:44 PM
  - re: blowing it - Fox - 9/13/2005 12:02:51 AM
    - Moving the relief supplies into the area ahead of time would've gotten them destroyed - Larry J - 9/14/2005 8:00:40 PM
    - 100 years of data on the effects of hurricanes can do nothing to prevent the effects of huricanes. - Scott Evil - 9/13/2005 2:40:10 PM
      - Strategy - Fox - 9/13/2005 4:10:19 PM
        
        So you are saying that our response time hasn't improved in over 100 years? - Scott Evil - 9/13/2005 7:52:54 PM
        
        No - Fox - 9/13/2005 9:51:25 PM
    - mobilization dates and times - Tom Brosz - 9/13/2005 1:29:17 AM
      - Walmart Beat The Feds In Places - Mark Eby - 9/13/2005 2:10:29 AM
  - *Warning* - FrankC (moderator) - 9/12/2005 8:50:15 PM
  - Move this crap to flame. - DL - 9/12/2005 5:53:04 PM
    - Have you been to the affected region? - Larry J - 9/12/2005 5:59:26 PM
      - No, and that is not what this is about - DL - 9/12/2005 6:05:40 PM
        
        re: No, and that is not what this is about - Larry J - 9/12/2005 8:52:15 PM
        
        And what about the people whose only concern is preventing *any* blame from landing on 'their guy(s)', even before its clear that its not deserved? Do they 'suck' too (n/t) - DL - 9/12/2005 10:43:20 PM
        
        "...even before its clear that its not deserved?" - Tom Brosz - 9/13/2005 12:19:00 AM
        
        Case in point.... (n/t) - DL - 9/13/2005 11:59:32 AM
- What's really a national disgrace... - Lindy - 9/12/2005 3:53:22 PM
  - Movie won't load the way I put it up - Lindy - 9/12/2005 4:21:59 PM
- Meanwhile: 426 and rising - Donald - 9/12/2005 1:52:52 PM
  - I thought it was 10,000? - Scott Evil - 9/12/2005 2:00:48 PM
    - Oh, you noticed that? - Tom Brosz - 9/12/2005 4:25:30 PM
      - Speaking of hyperbole: never saw anything like that headline (n/t) - alcaray - 9/12/2005 7:16:06 PM
    - I don't think anyone knows the final count - Donald - 9/12/2005 2:22:22 PM
      - Even if it is 1,000,000 homeless (any links?) - Scott Evil - 9/12/2005 2:31:51 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (31 posts)