Flame » in reply to Shall we now speak of "moral relativism"?

The whole thread (34 posts)

• Twas the Night Before Fitzmas... - Lindy - 10/28/2005 1:54:53 AM
  • Wait for it. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2005 4:10:38 AM
    • Waited, waited, waited, opened, saw. Happy. (n/t) - Tony - 10/28/2005 5:17:36 PM
    • You know, with this general a statement... - alcaray - 10/28/2005 4:44:27 PM
      • I told you so (n/t) - alcaray - 10/30/2005 4:43:21 PM
      • re: You know, with this general a statement... - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2005 8:51:45 PM
        • If Libby hadn't lied, there might be PROOF of a crime - dtb - 10/29/2005 7:20:26 PM
          • I must be missing something. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 8:53:46 PM
            • You are. - Tony - 10/31/2005 9:20:35 PM
        • So you are saying, then, that the Clinton impeachment was unfair? (n/t) - R.L. - 10/29/2005 6:41:01 AM
          • I didn't say this indictment was unfair. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 6:43:22 AM
            • At least this was directly related - tony - 10/29/2005 2:37:11 PM
        • Shall we now speak of "moral relativism"? - Fox - 10/29/2005 2:02:31 AM
          • Yer TV is missing. No indictment, no burglary? (n/t) - Bowser - 10/29/2005 12:18:54 PM
          • Hello? - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 2:32:08 AM
            • re: Hello? *knock knock* Is this working? - Fox - 10/29/2005 3:28:25 AM
              • Yes, a crime was committed. Unfortunately, not the one everyone was howling about. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 6:41:08 AM
                • Are you saying NOBODY outed Plame? - Laurie Street - 10/30/2005 9:00:07 PM
                  • I discussed this over on CE. Here's the deal. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/31/2005 4:13:19 AM
                  • How? Why are you asking me? Ask Fitzgerald. He had all the information. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 10:45:36 PM
                    • Well no, he didn't, because Scooter lied to him. - Fox - 10/31/2005 4:01:05 AM
                      • For me to accept that premise... - Tom Brosz - 10/31/2005 5:07:29 AM
                • And Al Capone was innocent excet for evading taxes. - tony - 10/29/2005 2:39:58 PM
        • "If the investigation had never taken place, there would have been no crime." - Mary Anne - 10/28/2005 11:46:29 PM
          • Fitzgerald - Mary Anne - 10/29/2005 3:42:22 AM
        • "there would have been no crime"? - Robert - 10/28/2005 10:54:10 PM
          • I think you may have missed the point. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 2:37:31 AM
            • You missed the points: - alcaray - 10/30/2005 4:50:28 PM
              • re: You missed the point - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 10:53:41 PM
            • Nope - Robert - 10/29/2005 4:40:25 AM
              • I guess you have to take what you can get, if it saves face. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2005 6:34:37 AM
                • Again: obstructing justice is a serious crime. - Mary Anne - 10/29/2005 1:18:54 PM
                  • Dan Schorr said this morning.. - tony - 10/29/2005 2:42:57 PM
        • " If the investigation had never taken place, there would have been no crime" - Lindy - 10/28/2005 10:42:59 PM